Ross v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “both the amount and manner of payment of a monetary award [following divorce] are committed to the discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doser v. Doser
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-07· cited 36×
• Omayaka v. Omayaka
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-24· cited 27×
• Jeffcoat v. Jeffcoat
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-11-30· cited 26×
• Beck v. Beck
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-07· cited 25×
• Skrabak v. Skrabak
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-28· cited 23×
• Thacker v. Hale
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-05· cited 13×
• Scott v. Scott
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-14· cited 12×
• Scamardella v. Illiano
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-09· cited 11×
• Cousin v. Cousin
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-09-29· cited 8×
• Schaefer v. Cusack
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-30· cited 7×
• Barnes v. Barnes
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-09· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Domingues v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-21· cited 82×
• Kirchner v. Caughey
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-13· cited 16×
• Ross v. Ross
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-30· cited 13×