Kirchner v. Caughey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “clear and affirmative showing” referred to in Munoz requires a factual finding of a causal relationship between the religious practices and the actual or probable harm to the child
• child psychiatrist determined that child suffered from anxiety was not conclusive where problems could just as easily have been attributed to parental conflicts
• “There is no discussion of the issues by the chancellor, and no indication that he applied his independent judgment____ We now make clear that the ... opinion of the chancellor should address ... the issues relating to the conclusions to be drawn from the facts found”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).