Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1/12/2009
Ross v. Continental Resources, Inc.
Citations
- 73 Mass. App. Ct. 497
- 899 N.E.2d 847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- violation of Mass. R.A.P 8[b][l], as amended, 430 Mass. 1603 [1999], is not automatically violation of Mass.R.A.P. 9[c] that can be enforced pursuant to Mass.R.A.P. 10[c]
- “We think it self-evident that filing a timely motion of arguable merit to obtain relief from judgment imposing significant adverse consequences is not an act G.L.c. 93A prohibits”
- appeal reinstated where delay was caused solely by court reporter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, McHugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.First Circuit· 2014-11-12· cited 57×
- Neuwirth v. NeuwirthMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-05-01· cited 14×
- Rass Corporation v. The Travelers Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-11-10· cited 13×
- T. Butera Auburn, LLC v. WilliamsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-04-17· cited 13×
- Board of Trustees of the Sea Grass Village Condominium v. BergquistMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2009-06-25· cited 3×
- Murad v. QuinonesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-09-26
- Johnson v. FreiMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-05-16
- Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court· 2010-06-10
- Specialized Technology Resources, Inc. v. JPS Elastomerics Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2011-02-10
- Anderson v. American International Group, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2014-06-11
- Graf v. Hospitality Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court· 2015-06-29
- Marbro Hudston, Inc. v. All Pro Productions, Inc.Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2014-02-27
- Stacy v. ZhaoMass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 2013-04-03
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court· 1988-05-23· cited 1,283×
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-09-17· cited 242×
- Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-03-14· cited 168×
- King v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-08-17· cited 152×
- Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-11-30· cited 121×
- Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-08-25· cited 107×
- Coraccio v. Lowell Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-05-05· cited 55×
- Donna Crossman v. Michael MacCoccioFirst Circuit· 1986-05-21· cited 48×
- Doliner v. BrownMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-03-14· cited 46×
- Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-09-08· cited 44×
- Killeen v. Westban Hotel Venture, LPMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-08-21· cited 36×
- Bonofiglio v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-05-11· cited 33×
- Our Lady of the Sea Corp. v. BorgesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-05-29· cited 17×
- Cruz Management Co. v. WidemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-05-12· cited 15×
- Danger Records, Inc. v. BergerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-04-14· cited 14×
- Russell v. McOwen-HaneltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-07-16· cited 9×
- Spivey v. NeitlichMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-10-27· cited 9×
- Maurice Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-08-08· cited 7×
- Adams v. PetersonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-01-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.