Roso v. Saxon Energy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a transaction where a party held “integral positions on both sides of the agreement” could not be “considered at arms-length.”
• transaction where a party held “integral positions on both sides of the agreement” could not be “considered at arms-length”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).