Twenty First Century L.P.I v. LaBianca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s reliance on its employee’s approval of construction vendors was justified where the “very purpose of their positions in the company was to monitor the hiring of contractors and the construction itself.”
• concluding defendant-employee was liable for common law fraud where he steered contracting work to a construction company from which he received kickbacks
• concluding defendant-employee breached his fiduciary duty to his employer by approving inflated invoices for which he obtained kickbacks
• construction director and supervisor who colluded with contractors to submit inflated invoices to owner in exchange for kickbacks held liable for harm caused directly to owner by scheme
• denying petitioner credit under section 3585(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).