Rosier v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a timely filed rule 3.850 motion may be amended prior to the postconviction court’s disposition even after the two-year time period for filing a timely motion under the rule has expired
• “Absent proof otherwise, the date reflected on the certificate of service of a pro se inmate’s document is presumed to be the date on which the document was filed.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Millette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-10· cited 1×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-31· cited 1×
• Jeffery McDonald v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-27· cited 1×
• Millette v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-13· cited 76×
• Pagan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-15· cited 10×
• Bulley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-22· cited 8×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-28· cited 5×
• Rosier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-15· cited 2×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17· cited 2×
• Curtis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-01· cited 1×