Graham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a timely filed rule 3.850 motion, prior to its disposition, may be amended even after the two-year period for a timely filed initial motion has run
• “A timely-filed rule 3.850 motion, prior to the trial court’s disposition of the motion, may be amended with sworn allegations relevant to the issue or issues raised in the motion, even after the two-year time period for filing a timely rule 3.850 motion has expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hempstead v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-09· cited 10×
• Bulley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-22· cited 8×
• Rosier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-01· cited 4×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-17· cited 2×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-02-15· cited 26×
• Norris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 2×
• Graham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-30· cited 1×