Rosenthal v. Schwab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that order of probate court denying motion to vacate order establishing heirship was final appealable order under court rule providing that order entered in administration of estate which finally determines status of party is appealable as of right
• holding same presumption rebutted on similar evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murphy v. McCloud
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-01· cited 103×
• In Re Estate of Devey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-01-28· cited 31×
• In Re Estate of Hutchins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-01-09· cited 17×
• Kaszuk v. Bakery and Confectionary Union
  N.D. Illinois· 1985-02-11· cited 14×
• Allen v. Bowen
  N.D. Illinois· 1987-03-10· cited 2×
• In re Trs. of the Marjorie T. Palmer Trust
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2018-12-21· cited 2×
• In Re RW
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Kaeding
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 131×
• Laurence v. Laurence
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-23· cited 45×
• In Re Estate of Kime
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-21· cited 42×
• People Ex Rel. Adams v. Mitchell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-10-30· cited 11×
• In Re Estate of Bailey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-23· cited 9×
• People Ex Rel. Davis v. Clark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-31· cited 9×
• In Re Estate of Larimore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-09-29· cited 8×
• Diak v. Hammler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-15· cited 8×