People v. Kaeding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revestment applied where both parties sought to set aside the prior judgment
• upholding Illinois’s guilty but mentally ill legislation, Ill.Ann.Stat. ch. 38 paras. 6-2 to 6-4, under an equal protection attack
• court's order which reaffirmed original order was final where it fully adjudicated the rights of the parties
• “In our opinion defendant misinterprets section 5 — 2—6(e)(1) in construing it as mandating the court to provide a course of treatment for every nonincarcerated defendant”
• under 6 the “narrow terms” of the revestment doctrine, opposing litigants may revest a court with jurisdiction through conduct that is inconsistent with the merits of the prior judgment
• “the Department’s motion specifically attacked the substance of the circuit court’s sentencing order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).