Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/28/2001
Rosenthal v. Budack
Citations
- 108 Wash. App. 602
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that under RCW 26.10.030(1), standing requirements are contained in the statute
- holding that under RCW 26.10.030(1), standing requirements are contained in the statute
- actual detriment was established when child was bipolar and suicidal and natural parents could not provide the needed therapy and stability
- actual detriment standard met when suicidal child required extensive therapy and stability that parents could not provide
- “The statute does not prohibit biological parents, whose parental rights were terminated, from petitioning for custody.”
- actual detriment standard met when suicidal child required extensive therapy and stability that parents could not provide
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 100×
- Shields v. HarwoodWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 96×
- Holt v. HoltWashington Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 52×
- In Re Custody of ACWashington Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 48×
- Nagel v. CorkWashington Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 41×
- In Re Parentage of LBCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-03· cited 33×
- Carvin v. BritainCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-05-03· cited 30×
- In Re Custody of SHBCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-18· cited 21×
- Luby v. DasilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-08-18· cited 21×
- Ramirez v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-07· cited 19×
- Link v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-03· cited 19×
- In Re Parentage of RFRCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-07· cited 18×
- Siufanua v. FugaWashington Supreme Court· 2017-01-19· cited 18×
- In Re Custody of ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-12· cited 11×
- In re the Custody of ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-12· cited 11×
- In re the Custody of J.E.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-04· cited 11×
- In re the Custody of: Z.C.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-15· cited 10×
- Kimberly Moehlmann v. Kelly M. LambertCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-01· cited 9×
- In re Custody of S.M.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-07-01· cited 5×
- State of Washington v. Lanny Lee GriffithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-12-31· cited 3×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 3,250×
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 2,046×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 321×
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 269×
- State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 163×
- In Re the Welfare of SumeyWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 139×
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-19· cited 89×
- In the Matter of Custody of StellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-18· cited 66×
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 65×
- Chapman v. PereraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-12· cited 51×
- In re NeffWashington Supreme Court· 1899-03-07· cited 37×
- Bedford v. SugarmanWashington Supreme Court· 1989-05-04· cited 36×
- Mitchell v. John DoeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-09-30· cited 25×
- In Re the Adoption of Baby Girl K.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-07-21· cited 24×
- In Re Custody of NunnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-12-18· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.