Washington Supreme Court· 6/8/2006
Shields v. Harwood
Citations
- 157 Wash. 2d 126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when determining custody between a parent and a nonparent, the best interests of the child standard is inappropriate
- \best interests\ analysis, standing alone, cannot substitute for an inquiry into parental unfitness
- “ ‘best interests’ ” analysis, standing alone, cannot substitute for an inquiry into parental unfitness
- when determining custody between a parent and a nonparent, the best interests of the child standard is inappropriate
- “Continuity of psychological relationships and family units was particularly important where a child had these special needs. Here, additional circumstances have not been alleged.”
- internal quotation 25 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 55303-1-II marks omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridge, Madsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Salas v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 2010-06-10· cited 229×
- In Re Welfare of ABWashington Supreme Court· 2010-06-10· cited 226×
- In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court· 2016-09-08· cited 184×
- In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 163×
- Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-09-21· cited 143×
- In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 100×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. LuakWashington Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 71×
- Grieco v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 57×
- In Re Custody of EatwWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 54×
- Holt v. HoltWashington Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 52×
- Fish v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-15· cited 50×
- Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-04-17· cited 50×
- In re the Welfare of L.N.B.-L.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-08-03· cited 50×
- In Re Custody of ACWashington Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 48×
- State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 47×
- In Re Custody of CCMCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-03-09· cited 41×
- Nagel v. CorkWashington Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 41×
- Mecum v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-03-09· cited 40×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinWashington Supreme Court· 2015-12-10· cited 35×
- Grieco v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-02· cited 32×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,333×
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 1,234×
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 1,061×
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court· 2003-07-07· cited 665×
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 255×
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 254×
- In Re Luke M.California Court of Appeal· 2003-04-23· cited 160×
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 146×
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 128×
- In Re Parentage of CAMAWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 113×
- American Continental Insurance v. SteenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-05-14· cited 113×
- American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-30· cited 112×
- Appel v. AppelWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 108×
- State v. SantosWashington Supreme Court· 1985-07-11· cited 90×
- In Re the Marriage of LittleWashington Supreme Court· 1981-10-08· cited 89×
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-19· cited 89×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.