Skip to main content

Rosenberger v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 159 Va. 953
  • 166 S.E. 464
  • 1932 Va. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Abuse of discretion and prejudice to the complaining party are essential to reversal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epes, Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rosenberger v. Commonwealth

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.