Skip to main content
· 1/9/1990

Lowery v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 387 S.E.2d 508
  • 9 Va. App. 304
  • 6 Va. Law Rep. 921
  • 1990 Va. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a proffer may be made “either during trial or after the verdict” when its only purpose is “to provide a complete record for appeal[ ] and not to assist the trial judge in ruling on the admissibility of evidence”
  • noting “the proffer [is] necessary only to provide a complete record for appeal ” (emphasis added)
  • finding no prejudice while assuming arguendo an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keenan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.