Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/11/1988
Rose v. State
Citations
- 74 Md. App. 644
- 539 A.2d 1142
- 1988 Md. App. LEXIS 79
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- substantive offenses of distribution and importation are not the same for double jeopardy purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wenner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-16· cited 57×
- Dillsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-27· cited 36×
- Waller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-12-15· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.