Skip to main content
· 5/27/1983

Rose v. Miller & Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 432 So. 2d 1237
  • 1983 Ala. LEXIS 4392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the existence of a legal duty is a question of law for the court, not the jury, to decide
  • recognizing the general rule that the owner of a chattel who surrenders entire control thereof to an \independent contractor or bailee\ is not liable for injuries to an employee of that independent contractor
  • recognizing the general rule that the owner of a chattel who surrenders entire control thereof to an \independent contractor or bailee\ is not liable for injuries to an employee of that independent contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Embry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.