Albert v. Hsu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no duty to protect 10-year-old decedent from car that backed through restaurant from adjacent parking lot because “harm was not reasonably foreseeable”
• no duty to protect 10-year-old decedent from car that backed through restaurant from adjacent parking lot because “harm was not reasonably foreseeable”
• “The existence of a legal duty is a question of law for the court; ‘where there is no duty, there can be no negligence.’”
• foreseeability of harm resulting from a vehicle crashing into a restaurant was “too remote” to create duty
• not reasonably foreseeable that a car would back “across the parking lot from a parking space, over a six-inch curb, across a sidewalk, and through the wall,” injuring plaintiff
• not reasonably foreseeable that a car would back “across the parking lot from a parking space, over a six-inch curb, across a sidewalk, and through the wall,” injuring plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).