Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 3/4/2005
Rosa v. Partners in Progress, Inc.
Citations
- 152 N.H. 6
- 868 A.2d 994
- 2005 N.H. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that undocumented worker could recover United States earnings in tort only if employer knew or should have known of worker's illegal status
- concluding that “an illegal alien’s status, though irrelevant to the issue of liability ... is relevant on the issue of lost earnings”
- holding that undocumented worker could recover United States earnings in tort only if employer knew or should have known of worker’s illegal status
- concluding that, although evidence of illegal immigrant status is prejudicial, such evidence is essential to claim for lost earning capacity measured at United States wage rates
- concluding that “an illegal alien’s status, though irrelevant to the issue of liability . . . is relevant on the issue of lost earnings”
- concluding that policy underlying federal immigration law precludes recovery of projected future U.S. wages in a tort action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Nadeau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsWashington Supreme Court· 2010-04-15· cited 138×
- Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLCNew York Court of Appeals· 2006-02-21· cited 96×
- Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co.California Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 69×
- Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-09-19· cited 29×
- Silva v. WilcoxColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-11-25· cited 21×
- Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.Second Circuit· 2006-11-14· cited 21×
- Republic Waste Services, Ltd. v. MartinezTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-20· cited 17×
- Coque v. Wildflower Estates Developers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-11-12· cited 17×
- Domingos Ayala v. LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-18· cited 17×
- Gonzalez v. Performance Painting, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-01-10· cited 11×
- Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 2017-05-04· cited 8×
- Wielgus v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2012-06-21· cited 7×
- Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-25· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2006-11-14· cited 4×
- Rodriguez v. Bollinger Gulf RepairLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-05-21· cited 4×
- David McKean v. Yates Engineering CorporationMississippi Supreme Court· 2016-09-15· cited 3×
- Scott, et al. v. First AmericanD. New Hampshire· 2007-01-17· cited 2×
- Gonzalez v. PERFORMANCE PAINTING, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-03-23
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-20
- GABRIEL, HUGO RAFAEL RAMIREZ v. JOHNSTON'S L.P. GAS SERVICE, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2012-06-15
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 3,438×
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 309×
- Rajni J. Patel v. Quality Inn South, Manibhai Patel and Dilip Patel, Sumani Corp., Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1988-08-15· cited 114×
- Estate of Cargill v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 65×
- Melendres v. SoalesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-04-07· cited 38×
- Singh v. Jutla & C.D. & R's Oil, Inc.N.D. California· 2002-08-05· cited 34×
- Mendoza v. Monmouth Recycling Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-03-07· cited 26×
- New El Rey Sausage Company, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1991-02-07· cited 24×
- Veliz v. Rental Service Corp. USA, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2003-12-19· cited 21×
- Janusis v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1933-11-27· cited 21×
- Martinez v. Fox Valley Bus Lines, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1936-12-24· cited 20×
- Public Administrator v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-04-01· cited 18×
- Hernandez v. M/V RajaanFifth Circuit· 1988-06-20· cited 18×
- Collins v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-02-07· cited 17×
- Sanango v. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-28· cited 13×
- Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-09-20· cited 13×
- Rodriguez v. KlineCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-11-03· cited 12×
- Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-12-28· cited 10×
- Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.New York Supreme Court· 2003-10-01· cited 8×
- Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.S.D. New York· 2004-04-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.