Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1/13/2000
Roquemore v. State
Citations
- 11 S.W.3d 395
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 332
- 2000 WL 19663
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statement taken without first complying with section 52.02 admissible because even though suspect was \in custody\ at time statement was given, statement was not a result of police interrogation
- holding that statement taken without first complying with section 52.02 admissible because even though suspect was “in custody” at time statement was given, statement was not a result of police interrogation
- holding that statement taken without first complying with section 52.02 admissible because even though suspect was \in custody\ at time statement was given, statement was not a result of police interrogation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davie Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roquemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-11-14· cited 167×
- in the Matter of E.M.R., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-31· cited 21×
- State v. SimpsonTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2000-12-29· cited 9×
- In re J.D.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-10-10· cited 9×
- Roquemore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-28· cited 1×
- In Re EMRTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-31
- In Re JDTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-10-10
- Yojan Santiago Hernandez Magueyal v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2024-03-21
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 205×
- Comer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 95×
- Baptist Vie Le v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-05-19· cited 55×
- Laird v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-10-10· cited 40×
- Anthony v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-09-24· cited 26×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-04-21· cited 15×
- In re R.R.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-15· cited 13×
- Melendez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-01-05· cited 9×
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.