Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/9/2017

Ronald Tussey v. ABB

Citations

  • 850 F.3d 951
  • 2017 WL 929202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a fiduciary’s actions, “when taken together and viewed in context, shed light on their motivations”
  • explaining that district court should have considered alternative approaches to calculating damages
  • noting the funds’ strategies only could be available to Plan participants through separately managed accounts if GSAM had been willing to forgo any management fees paid by the Plan, and GSAM was unwilling to do so
  • “Incentive awards compensate lead plaintiffs for their work and the benefit they have conveyed on the rest of the class.”
  • remanding case filed in 2006 on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Murphy, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.