Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/15/1991
Romjue v. Fairchild
Citations
- 803 P.2d 57
- 60 Wash. App. 278
- 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant waived the CR 12(b)(5) defense of insufficient service of process by initiating discovery unrelated to that defense
- merely engaging in discovery is not always tantamount to conduct inconsistent with a later assertion of the defense of insufficient service
- merely “engaging in discovery is not always tantamount to conduct inconsistent with a later assertion of the defense of insufficient service”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 365×
- Allstate Insurance v. KhaniCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-08· cited 63×
- King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2002-06-06· cited 60×
- Voicelink Data Services, Inc. v. Datapulse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-09· cited 55×
- Butler v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-20· cited 49×
- Harvey v. ObermeitCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-08-29· cited 33×
- O'Neill v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-01· cited 29×
- Gerean v. Martin-JovenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-30· cited 28×
- O'NEILL v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-06· cited 26×
- Davidheiser v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-08-21· cited 22×
- Blankenship v. KaldorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-07· cited 20×
- Sheldon v. FettigCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-09· cited 18×
- Blankenship v. KaldorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-11-12· cited 18×
- Clark v. FallingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-10-19· cited 15×
- Haywood v. ArandaWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-15· cited 13×
- Greenhalgh v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-14· cited 10×
- Lybbert v. Grant County, State of Wash.Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 6×
- Parry v. Windermere Real Estate/East, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-16· cited 5×
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-21· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-30· cited 66×
- Raymond v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-09-04· cited 30×
- Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court· 1974-12-19· cited 27×
- French v. GabrielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-03-19· cited 21×
- Crouch v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-06-13· cited 19×
- Matthies v. KnodelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-12-12· cited 17×
- Omaits v. RaberCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-18· cited 13×
- Voelker v. JosephWashington Supreme Court· 1963-06-27· cited 12×
- Missell v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1913-01-30· cited 7×
- Warfield v. FischerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1967-02-27· cited 4×
- Hubbard v. BrintonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1961-01-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.