Davidheiser v. Pierce County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even when the risk management office represented that it could accept service, service on that office was insufficient when the service statute required service on the county auditor or deputy auditor
• rejecting equitable estoppel claim because clarity of statutory provision precluded any reasonable reliance
• rejecting equitable estoppel claim because clarity of statutory provision precluded any reasonable reliance
• rejecting equitable estoppel claim because clarity of statutory provision precluded any reasonable reliance
• rejecting equitable estoppel claim because clarity of statutory provision precluded any reasonable reliance
• no waiver even where defendant engaged in discovery unrelated to defense before filing motion for summary judgment, where answer raised defense of insufficient service within statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).