Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/3/1971
Romano v. United Buckingham Freight Lines
Citations
- 484 P.2d 450
- 4 Wash. App. 929
- 1971 Wash. App. LEXIS 1464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- previous employer's comment that plaintiffs were dishonest actionable
- previous employer's comment that plaintiffs were dishonest actionable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-01-05· cited 81×
- Tilton v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1969-09-18· cited 53×
- Myers v. HarterWashington Supreme Court· 1969-09-25· cited 48×
- Getchell v. Auto Bar Systems Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1968-05-09· cited 22×
- Michielli v. U. S. Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1961-05-11· cited 19×
- Arnold v. National Union of Marine Cooks & StewardsWashington Supreme Court· 1954-02-02· cited 15×
- Harvey v. WightWashington Supreme Court· 1966-03-10· cited 12×
- Enright v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court· 1919-03-31· cited 5×
- Sohol v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court· 1971-01-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.