Romano v. Romano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of facts indicating a deliberate sacrificing of income in order to reduce a support obligation is condemnable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marriage of Little v. Little
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-19· cited 149×
• Cleary v. Cleary
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1976-02-04· cited 18×
• Colm v. Colm
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-10-02· cited 17×
• Garrow v. Garrow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 15×
• Roya v. Roya
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-03-29· cited 14×
• LAMBERT EX REL. ESTATE OF LAMBERT v. Beede
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-07-23· cited 8×
• Wolcott v. Wolcott
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 4×
• Graham v. Graham
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-11-05· cited 3×
• Bancroft v. Ackerman
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-09-08· cited 1×
• Wood Appeals
  Vermont Superior Court· 2008-03-06