Skip to main content
· 3/19/1999

Marriage of Little v. Little

Citations

  • 975 P.2d 108
  • 193 Ariz. 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “primary task” for a trial court is to weigh the evidence and consider all the circumstances to determine whether modification is warranted
  • recognizing that a child support obligation is paramount to all other financial obligations
  • noting that, when determining child support, court may impute income to parent “if the parent’s earnings are reduced voluntarily and not for reasonable cause”
  • stating family court “retain[s] discretion to consider the nature of the changes and the reasons for the changes” to “determine whether, under all the circumstances, a modification is warranted”
  • “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.”
  • “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Words, Phrases, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.