· 3/19/1999
Marriage of Little v. Little
Citations
- 975 P.2d 108
- 193 Ariz. 518
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “primary task” for a trial court is to weigh the evidence and consider all the circumstances to determine whether modification is warranted
- recognizing that a child support obligation is paramount to all other financial obligations
- noting that, when determining child support, court may impute income to parent “if the parent’s earnings are reduced voluntarily and not for reasonable cause”
- stating family court “retain[s] discretion to consider the nature of the changes and the reasons for the changes” to “determine whether, under all the circumstances, a modification is warranted”
- “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.”
- “An abuse of discretion exists when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is ‘devoid of competent evidence to support’ the decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Words, Phrases, Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.