D. Connecticut· 8/1/1996
Romanella v. Hayward
Citations
- 933 F. Supp. 163
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11120
- 1996 WL 434377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- extending tribal immunity to tribal members in charge of maintenance of parking lot on which plaintiff slipped
- \[A] native American tribe is not a citizen of a state within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and may not sue or be sued in federal court under the court's diversity jurisdiction.\
- “[A] native American tribe is not a citizen of a state within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and may not sue or be sued in federal court under the court's diversity jurisdiction.”
- ‘‘[The plaintiff’s] action against the tribal officers is a suit against the tribe. As such, the individual defendants’ immunity from suit is coextensive with the [t]ribe’s immunity from suit.’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nevas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bassett v. Mashantucket Pequot TribeSecond Circuit· 2000-02-28· cited 104×
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.S.D. New York· 2002-02-20· cited 96×
- Hilda Garcia v. Akwesasne Housing Authority and John RansomSecond Circuit· 2001-10-03· cited 70×
- Wright v. Colville Tribal Enterprise Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-07· cited 44×
- Trudgeon v. Fantasy Springs CasinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-04-21· cited 28×
- Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming EnterpriseCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 16×
- Romanella v. HaywardSecond Circuit· 1997-05-23· cited 13×
- Creasey v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court· 2003-09-17· cited 10×
- Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Co. v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictD. Vermont· 1997-04-03· cited 8×
- Wallett v. AndersonD. Connecticut· 2000-12-01· cited 7×
- Doe v. Oneida Indian NationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-12-07· cited 6×
- Tenney v. Iowa Tribe of KansasD. Kansas· 2003-01-07· cited 4×
- Worrall v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming EnterpriseD. Connecticut· 2001-02-02· cited 4×
- Zeth v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-10-02· cited 4×
- Stringer v. Chrysler (In Re Stringer)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-06-26· cited 3×
- In re Admission of UngerVeterans Claims· 2002-07-29· cited 3×
- Metcalf v. Coquille Indian Tribal CouncilCoquille Indian Tribal Court· 2009-06-18· cited 2×
- Bassett Entertainment Corp. v. Mashantucket Pequot TribeSecond Circuit· 2000-02-28· cited 1×
- Buzulis v. Mohegan Sun CasinoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-08-09· cited 1×
- D'Ambra v. MaikshiloMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court· 2012-06-19· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 1,620×
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court· 1947-04-07· cited 1,339×
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 915×
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 697×
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 635×
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court· 1942-03-02· cited 513×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Second Circuit· 1976-06-09· cited 472×
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 400×
- Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crafters, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-03-23· cited 400×
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 379×
- Grafon Corporation v. Elmer P. Hausermann and Marten C. HausermannSeventh Circuit· 1979-08-20· cited 179×
- Dahlberg v. BeckerSecond Circuit· 1984-11-09· cited 143×
- George C. Frey Ready-Mixed Concrete, Inc. v. Pine Hill Concrete Mix Corp.Second Circuit· 1977-05-06· cited 128×
- John B. Hull, Inc., the Sandmeyer Oil Company, Community Petroleum Products, Inc., and Dutchess Auto Co. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.Second Circuit· 1978-11-30· cited 121×
- Sac & Fox Nation v. HansonTenth Circuit· 1995-02-14· cited 82×
- Cadle Co. v. Bankston & LobingierSupreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 76×
- Hardin v. White Mountain Apache TribeNinth Circuit· 1985-02-26· cited 70×
- Standing Rock Sioux Indian Tribe v. Byron L. Dorgan, Tax Commissioner, State of North DakotaEighth Circuit· 1974-11-01· cited 69×
- Ronald Gaines v. Ski Apache, Formerly Known as Sierra Blanca, Formerly Known as Sierra Blanca Ski EnterprisesTenth Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 54×
- In Re Richard D. Greene and Donna J. Greene, Husband and Wife, Debtors, Ross Richardson, Chapter 7, Trustee-Appellee v. Mt. Adams FurnitureNinth Circuit· 1992-11-25· cited 53×
Other cases named Romanella v. Hayward
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.