Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 9/10/1982
Rojas v. State
Citations
- 450 A.2d 490
- 52 Md. App. 440
- 1982 Md. App. LEXIS 345
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the State has a legitimate interest in protecting public safety
- finding that recision of the entire plea agreement including the guilty plea, due to an unenforceable term of the agreement, places the parties back in their original position
- analogizing to contract principles in order to interpret fairly and enforce plea bargains
- invalidating plea arrangement in which defendant agreed not to oppose deportation
- agreement not to “oppose deportation” preempted under supremacy clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacDaniel and Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. Antonio-AntimoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-18· cited 1,021×
- Gutierrez, Maricela RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-10· cited 60×
- Chae v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-09-18· cited 55×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-14· cited 34×
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 34×
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-23· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Gessler v. MazzoneWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-10-11· cited 24×
- Hallford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-01-08· cited 18×
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-29· cited 16×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-20· cited 14×
- State v. ArvisoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-12-23· cited 8×
- State v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-11· cited 8×
- State v. BittingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-31· cited 8×
- Warrick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-05· cited 8×
- State v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-07· cited 7×
- Strawhorn v. StrawhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-13· cited 6×
- State v. ChertkovCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-05-13· cited 5×
- MY NGUYEN v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-29· cited 3×
- Falero v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-28· cited 3×
- Duran v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-09· cited 2×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 1,191×
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 608×
- State v. BurkhartTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-05-30· cited 260×
- Nyquist v. MaucletSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 245×
- Ralph Henry Cooper v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1979-03-05· cited 185×
- United States v. Reuben KrasnNinth Circuit· 1980-03-10· cited 115×
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-21· cited 96×
- United States v. I. H. Hammerman, IIFourth Circuit· 1975-10-29· cited 71×
- James Albert Jones v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1978-11-20· cited 56×
- United States v. Ramon Gasca-KraftNinth Circuit· 1975-08-21· cited 55×
- Dear Wing Jung v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1963-02-13· cited 53×
- Ronnie Lee Launius, Carroll Evan Sherrill, Paul Junior Ballard v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1978-05-26· cited 53×
- Salter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1980-07-30· cited 36×
- Sweetwine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-13· cited 27×
- Rutherford v. BlankenshipW.D. Virginia· 1979-03-13· cited 25×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-19· cited 24×
- United States v. Edgar C. McIntosh Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1979-12-18· cited 19×
- Louis Smith v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1963-08-16· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.