Rohm and Haas Co. v. Lin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that paragraphs 2 and 3 “are overly broad and not supported by the record”
• holding appellate review stringent where a default judgment is entered as a discovery sanction
• holding appellate review stringent where a default judgment is entered as a discovery sanction
• declining to award counsel fees pursuant to Rule 2744 when appellants “refer[red] to both facts and case law in support of their arguments” that trial court rulings were improper
• noting a motion for recusal does not meet the collateral order doctrine
• “Once an appeal is filed from a final order, all prior interlocutory orders become reviewable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).