Rogers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant was adequately advised by trial court of his right against self-incrimination despite use of other wording, and noting that defendant had also signed a statement as to his understanding that he was waiving the right not to incriminate himself
• holding that defendant was adequately advised by trial court of his right against self-incrimination despite use of other wording, and noting that defendant had also signed a statement as to his understanding that he was waiving the right not to incriminate himself
• Boykin does not require use of \any precisely-defined language or 'magic words' \ during plea hearing
• Boykin does not require use of “any precisely-defined language or ‘magic words’” during plea hearing (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-02-08· cited 18×
• Childs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-07· cited 12×
• Foster v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-20· cited 6×
• Stokes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-09· cited 4×
• Bennefield v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-09-10· cited 3×
• Dillard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-01
• Larry Foster v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-20
• Leonard Leroy Dillard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-05-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-09-28· cited 43×
• Hawes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 23×
• Carter v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-07-12· cited 22×