Bennefield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The indictment uses the language of the applicable statutes, including the essential elements of each offense, and is sufficiently definite to have advised [appellant] of what he must have been prepared to confront.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Collier v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-21· cited 79×
• Bennefield v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-09-10
• Leonard Antonio Tate-Jesurum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-06-22

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-05-15· cited 35×
• Grace v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-09-22· cited 21×
• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-09· cited 14×
• Deloney v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-02· cited 10×
• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-11-02· cited 9×
• LIZANA v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-05-17· cited 7×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-07-08· cited 6×
• Stokes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-05-09· cited 4×
• LEJEUNE v. McLAUGHLIN
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-07-14· cited 4×
• Frisby v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-08-20· cited 4×