Rogers v. Savage
Citations
- 112 Wash. 246
- 192 P. 13
- 1920 Wash. LEXIS 740
Syllabus
<p>New Tbial (5)—Successive Applications—Powers of Court. The court has no jurisdiction, after the denial of a motion for new trial and the proper entry of judgment in the case, to again consider a like motion, based upon the same grounds, and make another order in the case.</p> <p>Appeal (388)—Right to Allege Ebbor—Cross-Appeals. The supreme court is limited to matters complained of by appellant, in the absence of a cross-appeal by respondent.</p>
Judges: Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1897-12-06· cited 24×
- Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court· 1914-08-11· cited 24×
- Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-07-23· cited 11×
- Clein v. WandschneiderWashington Supreme Court· 1896-03-12· cited 6×
- Carkonen v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court· 1915-08-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.