Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/29/1980
Rogers v. Rogers
Citations
- 296 N.W.2d 849
- 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- valuing business by taking present value of husband’s earnings over next 11 years without excluding reasonable yearly compensation for him improper because it gave wife forced share of husband’s postmarital income
- although price in buy-sell agreement should not be ignored, court not required to accept that price as dispositive of value of husband’s interest in company
- it was reversible error not to consider the terms of the buy-sell agreement which create contingencies that affect the value such as the possibility the shareholder might die or be disabled before he realizes the full value of his interest
- award on assumption that husband would continue to contribute his talents and services to corporation was to essentially capitalize him; such award would give wife forced share of husband’s future work which as a property award could not be modified to reflect future changed circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheran, Peterson, Yetka, Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-10-23· cited 148×
- Bosserman v. BossermanCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-09-05· cited 94×
- Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-01-15· cited 86×
- Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-04-16· cited 68×
- Bettinger v. BettingerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-07-17· cited 66×
- Fechtor v. FechtorMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-02-14· cited 55×
- Cole v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-04-30· cited 35×
- Marriage of Berenberg v. BerenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-09-10· cited 35×
- Shear v. GabovitchMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-10-14· cited 28×
- Skrabak v. SkrabakCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-28· cited 23×
- Polley v. PolleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-22· cited 20×
- Marriage of Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-05· cited 20×
- Matter of Marriage of BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-06-28· cited 19×
- Marriage of Novick v. NovickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-16· cited 19×
- Marriage of Hein v. HeinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-04-23· cited 19×
- Lee v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-04-18· cited 19×
- Marriage of Bateman v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-18· cited 16×
- Grigsby v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-07-30· cited 16×
- Suther v. SutherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-13· cited 15×
- Marriage of Swanstrom v. SwanstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-12-18· cited 14×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.