Skip to main content
· 5/5/1989

Marriage of Lyon v. Lyon

Citations

  • 439 N.W.2d 18
  • 1989 Minn. LEXIS 110
  • 1989 WL 44172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need
  • stating that an award of spousal maintenance requires a showing of need
  • stating that, to the extent the district court’s finding that wife’s share of the marital estate would produce substantial income could be D-3 construed as a determination that the wife would have to invade her estate, it was clearly erroneous
  • contrasting “stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and obligations,” as well as “a profit-sharing account and IRA’s,” with “nonli-quid assets” such as a spouse’s home
  • stating that award of spousal maintenance requires showing of need
  • stating that “maintenance depends on a showing of need”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.