Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/5/1982
Rogers v. Rogers
Citations
- 441 A.2d 398
- 295 Pa. Super. 160
- 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mother had cause of action for her past expenditures in support and maintenance of children of marriage “under common law theories of restitution and of quasi-contract”
- noting potential effects of changes in Pennsylvania Long-Arm Statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Montemuro, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Santagate v. TowerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-08-25· cited 123×
- Mendel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-20· cited 33×
- Hodge v. MaithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 13×
- Lewkowitz v. LewkowitzDelaware Family Court· 1985-06-14· cited 2×
- Baronti v. BarontiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-24· cited 2×
- Ditzler v. KamermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-11· cited 1×
- Boswell v. Aetna Life InsuranceBeaver County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-08-10· cited 1×
- Garcia v. EvansAdams County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-12-28
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.