Ditzler v. Kamerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in which this court sustained the exercise of general personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5301(a)(l)(i) who was served with process in accordance with Pa.R.C.P., Rule 411 while he was present in the Commonwealth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).