Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/31/1974
Rogers v. Radio Shack
Citations
- 314 A.2d 113
- 271 Md. 126
- 1974 Md. LEXIS 1027
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an investigator’s report could not, consistent with due process requirements, be used against a party to unemployment compensation proceedings where the party had no opportunity to examine the report, cross-examine the investigator or rebut the contents of the report
- “with no opportunity for cross-examination or rebuttal, fundamental fairness would preclude reliance upon the [subsequently received] report by an administrative agency”
- “We agree with Rogers that under the circumstances here, with no opportunity for cross-examination or rebuttal, fundamental fairness would preclude reliance upon the report by an administrative agency”
- “Rogers appealed the administrative decision to the Circuit Court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Barnes, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 754×
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-16· cited 132×
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-20· cited 95×
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-01· cited 91×
- Sugarloaf Citizens' Ass'n v. Department of EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-20· cited 64×
- Maryland State Police v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-07· cited 55×
- Maryland Aggregates Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-22· cited 53×
- Everett v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-26· cited 49×
- Allen v. Core Target City Youth ProgramCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-05-29· cited 38×
- Public Service Commission v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-09-13· cited 33×
- Regan v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-24· cited 20×
- Superintendent v. HenschenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-22· cited 19×
- Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation v. HiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-11· cited 17×
- Tron v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-10· cited 11×
- Cecil County Department of Social Services v. RussellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-10· cited 11×
- Bryant v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-11-01· cited 10×
- Employment Security Administration v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-04· cited 10×
- Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-05-19· cited 9×
- Hider v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-30· cited 7×
- Hernandez v. Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-06-11· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Temmink v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-08· cited 69×
- Dal Maso v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-13· cited 46×
- Lloyd E. Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Employment Security BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-10-01· cited 14×
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-02-17· cited 12×
- State Board of Registration v. RuthCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-11-11· cited 11×
- Watkins v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-07-03· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.