Cecil County Department of Social Services v. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Department should have turned over an audio tape to the respondent before administrative hearing, notwithstanding Department’s argument that COMAR 07.02.26.02(B)(18
• holding that the Department should have turned over an audio tape to the respondent before administrative hearing, notwithstanding Department’s argument that COMAR 07.02.26.02(B)(18
• holding that the Department should have turned over an audio tape to the respondent before administrative hearing, notwithstanding Department’s argument that COMAR 07.02.26.02(B)(18) did not require production of the tape, because the broadly defined language of FL § 5-701(t
• holding that the Department should have turned over an audio tape to the respondent before administrative hearing, notwithstanding Department’s argument that COMAR 07.02.26.02(B)(18) did not require production of the tape, because the broadly defined language of FL § 5-70 l(t
• “Where the language of a statute differs from relevant language in a departmental regulation, the statutory language must control.”
• \Procedural due process in administrative law is recognized to be a matter of greater flexibility than that of strictly judicial proceedings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).