Skip to main content
· 9/25/2007

Rogers v. Andrus Transportation Services

Citations

  • 502 F.3d 1147
  • 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1316
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22722
  • 2007 WL 2774715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a warning under the fourth Ehrenhaus factor \is not a sine qua non for dismissal\ (italics omitted)
  • concluding litigant received constructive notice where district court had earlier entered show cause order warning that failure to file status report may result in dismissal
  • concluding litigant received constructive notice where district court had earlier entered show cause order warning that failure to file status report may result in dismissal
  • noting that a district court has inherent authority to consider sua sponte whether a case should be involuntarily dismissed
  • noting that a district court has inherent authority to consider sua sponte whether a case should be involuntarily dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute
  • noting that a district court has inherent authority to consider sua sponte whether a case should be involuntarily dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Ebel, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.