Skip to main content
· 2/12/1979

Forrest PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANPOWER, INC., Temporary Services, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 591 F.2d 615
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1117
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 17013
  • 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8990
  • 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, in a pro se employment discrimination lawsuit, that the district court clearly intended its without-prejudice dismissal under Rule 41(b) to be a dismissal of the entire action, which is appealable
  • “a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures”
  • “a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures”
  • “a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures”
  • “a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seth, Barrett, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.