Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the defendant’s use of a shotgun to commit multiple offenses did not preclude the separate enhancement of the offenses and did not violate double jeopardy principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ritchie v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 142×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-12-10· cited 99×
• Wells v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-15· cited 19×
• Akheem J. Purnell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-02-18

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
• Stirone v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
• Richardson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
• Overstreet v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-02-24· cited 125×
• King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-27· cited 107×
• Bald v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 61×
• Chubb v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 41×
• Banks v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 39×
• Miller v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-25· cited 35×
• Pierce v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-29· cited 28×
• Gates v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 21×
• Reid v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-11-17· cited 19×
• Hancock v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-23· cited 18×