District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/10/2010
Rodriguez v. State
Citations
- 27 So. 3d 753
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1337
- 2010 WL 447372
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the prosecutor’s misstatement regarding the burden of proof did not constitute fundamental error and affect the fairness of the trial where the misstatement “occurred only once, during closing argument”
- holding that prosecutor’s argument improperly shifting the burden of proof to the defense was not fundamental error because it was a brief, isolated comment and the jury was repeatedly told the correct burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramirez, C.J., and Gersten, and Suarez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-10-01· cited 115×
- Mosley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-07-16· cited 41×
- Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-12· cited 39×
- Murray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-13· cited 21×
- Clewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-06· cited 19×
- Northard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-12· cited 18×
- Heinz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.