Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/20/1968
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 442 P.2d 169
- 8 Ariz. App. 5
- 1968 Ariz. App. LEXIS 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Although a superseded pleading becomes functus officio, the effect of the trial court’s dismissal of the amended complaints was to restore the original complaint.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway, Molloy, Farley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court· 1975-01-08· cited 108×
- Stucky v. StuckyNebraska Supreme Court· 1971-04-09· cited 48×
- Campbell v. DeddensCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-03-13· cited 22×
- Magidow v. Coronado Cattle CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-26· cited 9×
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-15· cited 7×
- Storer v. StorerSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-04-07· cited 5×
- Pinebrook v. PinebrookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-26· cited 4×
- Weaver v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-25· cited 2×
- Marriage of Rutherford v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-12-08· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ackermann v. VordenbaumTexas Supreme Court· 1966-05-25· cited 249×
- Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-28· cited 38×
- Mignot v. ParkhillOregon Supreme Court· 1964-04-29· cited 34×
- Pegler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-10-24· cited 29×
- Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1954-10-13· cited 28×
- Buehman v. SmelkerArizona Supreme Court· 1937-06-01· cited 27×
- Liston v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-12-22· cited 23×
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsTenth Circuit· 1934-03-21· cited 17×
- Hindi v. BailonArizona Supreme Court· 1950-10-18· cited 11×
- Monarch Lumber Co. v. HaggardMontana Supreme Court· 1961-04-07· cited 11×
- In Re Lamm's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1954-12-14· cited 9×
- O'Day v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-11-03· cited 7×
- Viiliainen v. American Finnish Workers SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-04-25· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Peteet v. FrengerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1929-04-10· cited 6×
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.D. Montana· 1962-12-31· cited 3×
- Sawdey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-09-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.