Rodriguez v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There are few immutable rules to the doctrine of collateral estoppel because it is based on general notions of fairness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Martinez v. Kerr-McGee
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-10· cited 26×
• Lombardo v. Santevecchi
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1996-10-23· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Berkowitz
  New York Court of Appeals· 1980-05-08· cited 593×
• Gilberg v. Barbieri
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-06-16· cited 434×
• Staatsburg Water Co. v. Staatsburg Fire District
  New York Court of Appeals· 1988-07-07· cited 150×
• Venes v. Community School Board
  New York Court of Appeals· 1978-02-14· cited 78×
• Boorman v. Deutsch
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-11-09· cited 51×
• Lawrence v. Martin
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1986-02-13· cited 9×
• Foster v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
  New York Supreme Court· 1984-05-28· cited 2×