Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 107 S.W.3d 215
  • 2003 Ky. LEXIS 138
  • 2003 WL 21359612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]roof of flight to elude capture or to prevent discovery is admissible because ‘flight is always some evidence of a sense of guilt.’”
  • “Evidence of flight is admissible because it has a tendency to make the existence of the defendant’s guilt more probable: a guilty person probably would act like a guilty person.”
  • “In other words, there was evidence to infer that Rodriguez stole the truck as a means to escape arrest for the robbery, rather than as an end in itself. Thus, the evidence was relevant and admissible subject to the balancing test of KRE 403.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnstone, Cooper, Graves, Keller, Wintersheimer, Stumbo, Lambert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.