Doucoure v. Matlyn Food, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff seeking conditional certification “need only make a modest factual showing sufficient to demonstrate that they and potential plaintiffs together were victims of a common policy or plan that violated the law”
• finding that plaintiff’s “well-pleaded allegations” were sufficient to justify mailing notice to potential collective action members
• granting preliminary certification where a plaintiff solely offered his allegations as evidence in support
• stating the end point for the lookback period for providing notice is generally the date of the notice, i.e., notice of pendency would be provided to potentially similarly-situated plaintiffs employed by defendant in three-year period preceding date of the notice
• stating the end point for the lookback period for providing notice is generally the date of the notice, i.e., notice of pendency would be provided to potentially similarly-situated plaintiffs employed by defendant in three-year period preceding date of the notice
• stating the end point for the lookback period for providing notice is generally the date of the notice, i.e., notice of pendency would be provided to potentially similarly-situated plaintiffs employed by defendant in three-year period preceding date of the notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).