Skip to main content

Rodgers v. State

Citations

  • 486 S.W.2d 794
  • 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a prosecutor may comment on the accused’s failure to call a witness absent a showing that the witness was incompetent or that the accused could not, despite his exercise of due diligence, secure the witness’s attendance at the trial
  • explaining that a prosecutor may comment on the accused’s failure to call a witness absent a showing that the witness was incompetent or that the accused could not, despite his exercise of due diligence, secure the witness’s attendance at the trial
  • explaining that a prosecutor may comment on the accused’s failure to call a witness absent a showing that the witness was incompetent or that the accused could not, despite his exercise of due diligence, secure the witness’s attendance at the trial
  • explaining that a prosecutor may comment on the accused’s failure to call a witness absent a showing that the witness was incompetent or that the accused could not, despite his exercise of due diligence, secure the witness’s attendance at the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.