Skip to main content

Garrett v. State

Citations

  • 632 S.W.2d 350
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • highlighting the reason the prosecution could not comment on the defendant’s failure to call additional witnesses was because nothing in the record reflected the existence of other witnesses who could have testified on the defendant’s behalf
  • highlighting the reason the prosecution could not comment on the defendant's failure to call additional witnesses was because nothing in the record reflected the existence of other witnesses who could have testified on the defendant's behalf
  • explaining that \an implied or indirect allusion to the failure of the appellant to testify\ is not enough to support error unless the comment calls \for a denial of an assertion of fact. . . that only the appellant was in a position to offer\
  • highlighting the reason the prosecution could not comment on the defendant’s failure to call additional witnesses was because nothing in the record reflected the existence of other witnesses who could have testified on the defendant’s behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Dally, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.