M.D. Pennsylvania· 6/15/1984
Roche v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
Citations
- 603 F. Supp. 1411
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allegations which merely cite certain trades deemed inappropriate by the plaintiff are insufficient for a churning claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nealon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vogel v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-12-31· cited 36×
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauS.D. New York· 1988-07-29· cited 18×
- Denison v. KellyM.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-03-20· cited 15×
- United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. BradleyN.D. Oklahoma· 2005-08-01· cited 7×
- Hill v. Equitable Bank, N.A.D. Delaware· 1985-12-20· cited 6×
- Citizens Savings Ass'n v. FranciscusM.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-12-30· cited 4×
- Robinson v. Kidder, Peabody and Co., Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1987-07-02· cited 4×
- Gopez v. ShinD. Delaware· 1990-04-18· cited 1×
- McBlaine v. Jack Carl Associates, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1989-02-03· cited 1×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 759×
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergEighth Circuit· 1982-08-11· cited 384×
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndNinth Circuit· 1970-09-04· cited 185×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,872 Lila A. Miley v. Oppenheimer & Company, Inc., Anthony L. Geller and John W. HamiltonFifth Circuit· 1981-02-17· cited 170×
- Armstrong v. McalpinSecond Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 145×
- Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.N.D. California· 1968-03-28· cited 123×
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossSecond Circuit· 1977-08-24· cited 103×
- Adair v. Hunt International Resources Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1981-11-18· cited 91×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,508 Samuel Mihara v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc. And George GracisNinth Circuit· 1980-05-23· cited 85×
- Kimmel v. PetersonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 74×
- Landmark Savings & Loan v. RhoadesE.D. Michigan· 1981-11-20· cited 68×
- Harper v. New Japan Securities International, Inc.C.D. California· 1982-08-18· cited 60×
- J.C. Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity ServicesEighth Circuit· 1970-08-27· cited 56×
- Barr v. WUI/TAS, Inc.S.D. New York· 1975-02-26· cited 53×
- Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.S.D. New York· 1983-07-11· cited 50×
- Baselski v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1981-05-20· cited 45×
- North Barrington Development, Inc. v. FanslowN.D. Illinois· 1980-10-09· cited 43×
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 1981-12-02· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.