S.D. New York· 2/26/1975
Barr v. WUI/TAS, Inc.
Citations
- 66 F.R.D. 109
- 19 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1318
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court expresses concern about the “patently unfair” implication “that defendant is somehow involved in organized crime” that could arise from “[t]he mere granting of leave to file a [RICO] claim”
- ESA and antitrust claims; ESA claims dismissed with leave to amend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacMahon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanSecond Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 535×
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergEighth Circuit· 1982-08-11· cited 384×
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1984-07-25· cited 220×
- Windham v. American Brands, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1977-10-11· cited 184×
- Schacht v. BrownSeventh Circuit· 1983-04-08· cited 164×
- In Re Master Key Antitrust LitigationSecond Circuit· 1975-12-22· cited 131×
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-04-09· cited 119×
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-10-21· cited 117×
- Adair v. Hunt International Resources Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1981-11-18· cited 91×
- United States v. MandelD. Maryland· 1976-03-31· cited 88×
- Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc.S.D. New York· 1983-01-10· cited 79×
- Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.C.D. California· 1983-06-17· cited 78×
- Kimmel v. PetersonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 74×
- Taylor v. Bear Stearns & Co.N.D. Georgia· 1983-09-30· cited 64×
- Harper v. New Japan Securities International, Inc.C.D. California· 1982-08-18· cited 60×
- Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-04-01· cited 54×
- Windsor Associates, Inc. v. GreenfeldD. Maryland· 1983-05-18· cited 51×
- Shelter Realty Corp. v. Allied Maintenance Corp.S.D. New York· 1977-06-13· cited 49×
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 1981-12-02· cited 43×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 41×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 537×
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 471×
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Second Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 440×
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncFifth Circuit· 1952-12-17· cited 341×
- Yellow Cab Co. v. Democratic Union Organizing Committee, Local 777Supreme Court· 1969-01-13· cited 108×
- Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.S.D. New York· 1972-02-14· cited 105×
- Marie Wilcox, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. Commerce Bank of Kansas City, a Corporation, Appellee-DefendantTenth Circuit· 1973-03-19· cited 101×
- Minnesota Bearing Co. v. White Motor Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1973-01-09· cited 57×
- The Balian Ice Cream Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Arden Farms Co., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1956-03-26· cited 50×
- Mt. Lebanon Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationW.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-05-01· cited 38×
- Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1971-11-18· cited 36×
- Kriger v. European Health SPA, Inc.E.D. Wisconsin· 1972-07-18· cited 34×
- Friedman v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyS.D. New York· 1966-12-08· cited 29×
- Johnson v. Partrederiet BrovigtankS.D. New York· 1962-03-09· cited 20×
- Cutner v. FriedS.D. New York· 1974-03-13· cited 20×
- Manning v. University of Notre Dame Du LacTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals· 1973-09-19· cited 16×
- Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.S.D. California· 1952-04-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.