Rocha-Gonzalez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not \insane\ did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation
• holding that the trial court’s statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not ‘insane’ did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson’s proffered evidence of mitigation
• prosecutor’s argument that the victims also did not have a chance was proper rebuttal to the mitigating evidence that Ferguson did not have a chance because of his difficult childhood and his low intelligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).