Supreme Court· 3/4/2002

Rocha-Gonzalez v. United States

Citations

535 U.S. 906
122 S. Ct. 1207
70 U.S.L.W. 3551
152 L. Ed. 2d 145
2002 U.S. LEXIS 1423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not \insane\ did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation
holding that the trial court’s statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not ‘insane’ did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson’s proffered evidence of mitigation
prosecutor’s argument that the victims also did not have a chance was proper rebuttal to the mitigating evidence that Ferguson did not have a chance because of his difficult childhood and his low intelligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rocha-Gonzalez v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.