Washington Supreme Court· 12/31/1980
Robroy Land Co. v. Prather
Citations
- 622 P.2d 367
- 95 Wash. 2d 66
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a right of first refusal did not create a restraint on alienation because “[t]he marketability of the property remained] unfettered”
- “option restraint is reasonable if the option price is at market or appraised value, irrespective of the duration of the option”
- a commercial agreement is presumed to inherently possess a reasonable limit on duration
- a potential buyer’s right of first refusal to purchase real property is only a contractual right that does not create an interest in land subject to the rule against perpetuities
- rule not applicable to preemptive rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hicks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1986-04-01· cited 102×
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-09· cited 87×
- Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-10· cited 78×
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 76×
- Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 75×
- Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. CONDO. ASS'N ONE, INC.Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 61×
- In Re Estate of NiehenkeWashington Supreme Court· 1991-10-31· cited 51×
- South Kitsap Family Worship Center v. WeirCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-11-07· cited 46×
- Old National Bank v. ArnesonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-13· cited 43×
- Bortolotti v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-05-21· cited 42×
- Hartnett v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court· 1981-06-19· cited 37×
- Cambridge Co. v. East Slope Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-28· cited 36×
- Shiver v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-07-07· cited 35×
- Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-03-18· cited 35×
- Wildenstein & Co. v. WallisNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-06-09· cited 34×
- Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court· 1981-09-24· cited 28×
- Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluD. Hawaii· 1986-09-25· cited 28×
- Ernst Home Center, Inc. v. SatoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-05· cited 26×
- Washington State Grange v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-11· cited 25×
- Feider v. FeiderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-09· cited 17×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-11-21· cited 75×
- Weber v. Texas Co.Fifth Circuit· 1936-05-12· cited 46×
- Atchison v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado· 1970-01-26· cited 44×
- Bennett Veneer Factors, Inc. v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court· 1968-05-16· cited 39×
- Singer Company v. Makad, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-01-26· cited 26×
- Robroy Land Co. v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-10-24· cited 4×
Other cases named Robroy Land Co. v. Prather
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.